Medical Imaging Convention [rescheduled] Mar 09, 2021 - Mar 10, 2021 — National Exhibition Centre, Birmingham, England
9th SINAPSE Neuro-oncology Imaging Meeting [rescheduled] Mar 11, 2021 09:30 AM - 03:30 PM — West Park Conferencing & Events, 319 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1NN
Total Body PET 2020 conference [rescheduled] Jun 05, 2021 - Jun 07, 2021 — McEwan Hall, University of Edinburgh

eLearning

SINAPSE experts from around Scotland have developed ten online modules designed to explain medical imaging. They are freely available and are intended for non-specialists.


Edinburgh Imaging Academy at the University of Edinburgh offers the following online programmes through a virtual learning environment:

Neuroimaging for Research MSc/Dip/Cert

Imaging MSc/Dip/Cert

PET-MR Principles & Applications Cert

Applied Medical Image Analysis Cert

Online Short Courses

Carotid Artery Stenosis: Accuracy of Noninvasive Tests-Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis

Author(s): F. M. Chappell, J. M. Wardlaw, G. R. Young, J. H. Gillard, G. H. Roditi, B. Yip, J. P. Pell, P. M. Rothwell, M. M. Brown, M. J. Gough, M. S. Randall

Abstract:
Purpose: To find clinically relevant estimates of the accuracy of noninvasive imaging-Doppler ultrasonography (US), computed tomographic (CT) angiography, magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and contrast material-enhanced MR angiography -in diagnosing both severe and moderate symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to ascertain the effect of prespecified clinical factors and clinical setting on diagnostic accuracy; and to estimate the probability of agreement between two noninvasive tests. Materials and Methods: Original principal investigators obtained ethics approval for each data set. All data were anonymized. Individual patient data sets (IPDs) for noninvasive imaging tests were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the tests for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis; to compare ipsilateral with contralateral arteries; to compare IPDs with literature estimates; to compare routine audit and research data; and to determine the effect of age and sex on sensitivity and specificity. Results: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography was the most accurate (sensitivity, 0.85 [30 of 35]; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69, 0.93; and specificity, 0.85 [67 of 78]; 95% CI: 0.76, 0.92) for 70%-99% symptomatic stenosis. Sensitivity for a 50%-69% stenosis was poor, although data were limited. Sensitivity and specificity were generally lower in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral artery. IPD estimates were lower than literature values. Results of comparison of research with audit-derived data were inconclusive. Neither age nor sex affected accuracy. Agreement was better between two Doppler US tests and between two contrast-enhanced MR angiographic tests than it was between Doppler US and contrast-enhanced MR angiography, except for a 70%-99% symptomatic stenosis. Conclusion: Primary studies should distinguish ipsilateral from contralateral arteries and carefully describe the patients' characteristics and study environment. The literature overestimates noninvasive imaging accuracy. More data are needed to inform physicians in routine clinical practice.

Full version: Available here

Click the link to go to an external website with the full version of the paper


ISBN: 0033-8419
Publication Year: 2009
Periodical: Radiology
Periodical Number: 2
Volume: 251
Pages: 493-502
Author Address: