Medical Imaging Convention [rescheduled] Mar 09, 2021 - Mar 10, 2021 — National Exhibition Centre, Birmingham, England
9th SINAPSE Neuro-oncology Imaging Meeting [rescheduled] Mar 11, 2021 09:30 AM - 03:30 PM — West Park Conferencing & Events, 319 Perth Road, Dundee DD2 1NN
Total Body PET 2020 conference [rescheduled] Jun 05, 2021 - Jun 07, 2021 — McEwan Hall, University of Edinburgh


SINAPSE experts from around Scotland have developed ten online modules designed to explain medical imaging. They are freely available and are intended for non-specialists.

Edinburgh Imaging Academy at the University of Edinburgh offers the following online programmes through a virtual learning environment:

Neuroimaging for Research MSc/Dip/Cert

Imaging MSc/Dip/Cert

PET-MR Principles & Applications Cert

Applied Medical Image Analysis Cert

Online Short Courses

Dos the presence of hibernating myocardium in patients with impaired left ventricular contraction affect QT dispersion?

Author(s): A. Al Mohammad, I. R. Mahy, A. Buckley, R. I. Cargill, M. Y. Norton, A. E. Welch, S. Walton

Background Hibernating myocardium is associated with increased cardiovascular events. Increased QT dispersion on the surface electrocardiogram is a marker For serious ventricular arrhythmias. In this study, we determine whether hibernating myocardium is associated with increased QT dispersion in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular contraction. Methods Positron emission tomography with N-13-ammonia and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose determined the presence of metabolic-perfusion mismatch defect. QT dispersion was measured by means of a digitizing tablet with validated software. QT intervals were measured on two separate occasions by two investigators blinded to the result of the positron emission tomography scans. Results Forty-two patients with impaired left ventricular contraction were studied. They were divided into two groups: group A was made vp of patients with mismatch defects (n = 26) and group B was made vp of patients with no mismatch defects (n = 16). The mean (SD) QT dispersion measurements were 61.7 +/- 29.8 ms and 70 +/- 24.6 ms for groups A and B, respectively (not significant). When the patients were divided according to the dominant viability status of the impaired myocardial segment, a similar result was found. The patients whose impaired myocardium was dominantly hibernating (n = 19) had a mean QT dispersion of 66.4 +/- 31.9 ms compared with 63.6 +/- 24.8 ms in the patients whose impaired myocardium was mainly scarred (not significant). Conclusions QT dispersion is not affected by the presence of hibernating myocardium and is therefore not clinically useful in identifying patients with this phenomenon. This is in contrast with recent reports by other groups and calls for further investigation of this dichotomy.

Full version: Available here

Click the link to go to an external website with the full version of the paper

ISBN: 0002-8703
Publication Year: 2001
Periodical: American Heart Journal
Periodical Number: 6
Volume: 141
Pages: 944-948
Author Address: