Scottish Clinical Imaging Network (SCIN) Annual Event 2020 [postponed] Apr 30, 2020 09:00 AM - 04:00 PM — Glasgow Caledonian University
NCITA National Conference: Translating Imaging Biomarkers for Improved Patient Outcomes [postponed] May 05, 2020 10:00 AM - 05:00 PM — New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, King's College London
Scottish Radiological Society Spring Meeting 2020 [postponed] May 15, 2020 09:00 AM - 04:10 PM — Centre for Health Science, Inverness
2020 SINAPSE ASM Jun 19, 2020 09:00 AM - 05:00 PM — Virtual Meeting (online)
3rd International Conference on Medical Imaging with Deep Learning Jul 06, 2020 - Jul 08, 2020 — Palais des congrès, Montréal, Canada

eLearning

SINAPSE experts from around Scotland have developed ten online modules designed to explain medical imaging. They are freely available and are intended for non-specialists.


Edinburgh Imaging Academy at the University of Edinburgh offers the following online programmes through a virtual learning environment:

Neuroimaging for Research MSc/Dip/Cert

Imaging MSc/Dip/Cert

PET-MR Principles & Applications Cert

Applied Medical Image Analysis Cert

Online Short Courses

Evaluation of the Translational and Rotational Forces Acting on a Highly Ferromagnetic Orthopedic Spinal Implant in Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Author(s): C. McComb, D. Allan, B. Condon

Abstract:
Purpose: To assess the translational and rotational forces acting on a highly ferromagnetic orthopedic spinal implant in 1.5T and 3.OT magnetic resonance (MR) systems. Materials and Methods: The translational forces and rotational forces, or torques, acting on the implant were measured using existing methods and assessed using the guidelines produced by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Results: The measured translational forces were many times greater than for any other orthopedic implant previously recorded in the literature and, based on deflection angle criteria, would be considered unsafe in both MR systems. However, due to the rigid fixation of orthopedic implants in bone, implant migration is considered highly unlikely. Several constituent components of the implant were subjected to large torques, in some cases an order of magnitude greater than the corresponding torque due to gravity. However, the counterbalancing effect of the configuration of the combined implant results in a net torque that is less than the torque due to gravity. Conclusion: The translational and rotational forces acting on the implant in both 1.5T and 3.OT MR systems are substantial, but based on theoretical considerations are unlikely to result in implant migration or rotation.

Full version: Available here

Click the link to go to an external website with the full version of the paper


ISBN: 1053-1807
Publication Year: 2009
Periodical: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Periodical Number: 2
Volume: 29
Pages: 449-453
Author Address: McComb, C So Gen Hosp, Inst Neurol Sci, Dept Clin Phys, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland So Gen Hosp, Inst Neurol Sci, Dept Clin Phys, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland So Gen Hosp, Queen Elizabeth Spinal Injuries Unit, Glasgow G51 4TF, Lanark, Scotland