BMUS Ultrasound 2019 Dec 10, 2019 - Dec 12, 2019 — Harrogate, England
Scottish Ophthalmic Imaging Society meeting Feb 14, 2020 09:30 AM - 05:00 PM — Royal Society of Edinburgh, 22-26 George Street, Edinburgh
2nd Scottish Ultrasound Annual Scientific Meeting Feb 28, 2020 10:00 AM - 05:00 PM — Collins Building, University of Strathclyde
8th Annual Scottish Radiotherapy Research Forum Mar 12, 2020 10:00 AM - 04:30 PM — Stirling Court Hotel, University of Stirling
Medical Imaging Convention 2020 Mar 17, 2020 10:00 PM - 04:00 PM — National Exhibition Centre, Birmingham, England

eLearning

SINAPSE experts from around Scotland have developed ten online modules designed to explain medical imaging. They are freely available and are intended for non-specialists.


Edinburgh Imaging Academy at the University of Edinburgh offers the following online programmes through a virtual learning environment:

Neuroimaging for Research MSc/Dip/Cert

Imaging MSc/Dip/Cert

PET-MR Principles & Applications Cert

Applied Medical Image Analysis Cert

Online Short Courses

External quality assurance for image grading in the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme

Author(s): K. A. Goatman, S. Philip, A. D. Fleming, R. D. Harvey, K. K. Swa, C. Styles, M. Black, G. Sell, N. Lee, P. F. Sharp, J. A. Olson

Abstract:
AIMS: To develop and evaluate an image grading external quality assurance system for the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme. METHOD: A web-based image grading system was developed which closely matches the current Scottish national screening software. Two rounds of external quality assurance were run in autumn 2008 and spring 2010, each time using the same 100 images. Graders were compared with a consensus standard derived from the top-level graders' results. After the first round, the centre lead clinicians and top-level graders reviewed the results and drew up guidance notes for the second round. RESULTS: Grader sensitivities ranged from 60.0 to 100% (median 92.5%) in 2008, and from 62.5 to 100% (median 92.5%) in 2010. Specificities ranged from 34.0 to 98.0% (median 86%) in 2008, and 54.0 to 100% (median 88%) in 2010. There was no difference in sensitivity between grader levels, but first-level graders had a significantly lower specificity than level-two and level-three graders. In 2008, one centre had a lower sensitivity but higher specificity than the majority of centres. Following the feedback from the first round, overall agreement improved in 2010 and there were no longer any significant differences between centres. CONCLUSIONS: A useful educational tool has been developed for image grading external quality assurance.

Full version: Available here

Click the link to go to an external website with the full version of the paper


ISBN: 1464-5491 (Electronic) 0742-3071 (Linking)
Publication Year: 2011
Periodical: Diabet Med
Periodical Number: 6
Volume: 29
Pages: 776-83
Author Address: School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK. k.a.goatman@abdn.ac.uk